Argh.
I want to rebuff some of Somik's last points about Pulp (and, less so, Blur)
and agree with his assessment of the Manics' last album, but first it's time to talk about ownership.
Getting angry or involved with Youtube comments is like shouting swearwords at the sun in the hope that night will come.
There is, however, this odd thing that I keep noticing, and that's the concept of pre-popularity ownership. Don't worry, it's been around forever, and it'll go on as long as someone discovers something before it gets popular, but I just find it (a) sad and (b) a little bit funny, somehow.
Exhibit (A) would be Short Change Hero by The Heavy. On its own it has many merits, not least because it sounds like – to me – the perfect song for a modern spaghetti western, should such a thing be possible. Stripped of that, it's a strange mix of soul, indie-guitar and a killer chorus, just like I used to like, and whatnot.
I'd never have discovered it, except for Batman.
Let's back that up.
The first time I heard the song was in the trailer for Arkham
City, and it does, really, fit therein:
I liked it enough to remember it, which, in the modern era of music, is a hell of a compliment.
After
that, I didn't hear it again until I started playing Borderlands 2:
Where, again, it's used really nicely, playing even more into the Western imagery, and, as an added plus, there's a midget in a hockey mask.
But
after this I started reading Youtube comments out of a bizarre sense
of interest, only to discover the pre/Borderlands
2 post/Borderlands
2
fan split was both really polarized and really funny.
(As
an aside, there's something interesting to be said about Rexon's
cover of the song where the lead singer is cosplaying as a character
from Borderlands 2
(well,
from Borderlands
in their Borderlands
2
form. I think. It gets confusing:
But even in those comments, people are arguing about Borderlands, not the song.)
But even in those comments, people are arguing about Borderlands, not the song.)
(Also, as an aside, the song turns up as the theme to Strike Back
and, also, in the film Faster:
So
here's the question; are put
here
and come here the
same thing, where put
here
is knowing of a song before it gets featured in another piece of work
and come here
means
drawn by the song's presence in another form of media? Just exactly
why does it make you a bigger fan to be into something before
everyone else? Why do you have to defend yourself on a worldwide
internet forum against people you're never
going to meet?
Is this just basic musical territoriality?
This
is arguably even more interesting when the usage of the song changes
the context of the lyrics. Look at Richard Thompson's Dad's
Gonna Kill Me for instance:
As the put here argumentative viewers will state it, and as is the case, the song's about the occupation of Baghdad and just how shitty that is if you're a soldier.
As the put here argumentative viewers will state it, and as is the case, the song's about the occupation of Baghdad and just how shitty that is if you're a soldier.
It's
arguably completely different in the case of Sons
of Anarchy,
where the song is used for the end of – if memory serves – the
first episode of the third series, to underscore a really tense part
(and aren't you glad I learnt how not to do spoilers?) of the end of
the show. Bear in mind, however, that Sons
of Anarchy is
Hamlet crossed
with Hunter S. Thompson's Hells
Angels,
so the song works
in
the context of the show but not with the original lyrical intent
(unless, as you might argue, it signals the final and terminal shift
of the show's protagonists from a wavering footing to a full on war
footing).
I'm
sure there are a multitude of other examples of this that will occur
to me immediately after publishing this, but it fascinates me as a
Basic Hipster Reflex in action to be into something before
it was cool.
It's the same reaction, albeit dialled down massively, that I used to
have to hearing music I used listen to as a teenager on, say, Radio
2. (Fortunately, it's been four years since I've listened to Radio 2,
but the scars still remain.)
Nobody
owns
a song. But it's interesting that they think they do.
- James
P.s. I did think about actually posting examples of Youtube comments and commentators, but that way, sadly, lies madness. Although, as one of them did put it, songs these days are too genetic.
No comments:
Post a Comment