So here’s an interesting query; how does
anyone make any money anymore?
Here’s an example. For the Nick Cave
‘review’, I got the album for £4.99, digital download and all, from Amazon. But
how much of that £4.99 does Nick Cave – and his Caverns (I’m sure I should know
the name of any of his musicians, but, well, no, sorry) see? You can bet your
bottom dollar that a lot of that goes to Amazon for hosting fees and arbitrage,
and the record company probably eats some of the rest- but it’s £4.99, for the
love of your deity of choice; there’s only so much to go around.
This is extremely pertinent considering
that yesterday was Record Shop Day. Which is nice, except I haven’t had a record
shop anywhere near me for about ten
years. Don’t get me wrong, I respect the idea. I respect the thinking behind it
– the socialization of an slowly desocialised media – because, over time, gigs are becoming more of a hassle and
downloads directly less so – and I love the idea of a record shop, but if you
live in certain places, it’s going to cost more to get to one than to spend
that self-same money on, well, music.
This is just me talking – and, we all know,
I love talking – but if I had wanted to go to a record store today it would
have cost a bare minimum of either £20 in train tickets or approximately £30 in
petrol money before parking, etcetera. And I don’t live in the styx, the back
of beyond or the quiet places; I’m near a big town, with decent services, and absolutely
no record store.
Shit, even HMV shuttered their bars a few
months ago and won’t be coming back.
As I say, I really do understand the joy of
a record shop and, more than anything, I get that there’s a happiness to owning
the physicality of an object – hell, I’m jealous of Somik’s Postal Service vinyl like you wouldn’t believe. But I gave up my record players and
walkmen and cd players and, well, minidisc players a l-o-n-g time ago, because
of three things:
- (I) Convenience
- (II) Ease of Use
- (III) I don’t have to wear trousers
to buy MP3s.
On the last point, I probably should, but
substitute it for I don’t have to leave
the house and you get the same meaning without the mental image.
Even if something’s not available on MP3
via all the major music outlets, it’s easier to buy it Used and New these days
than anything. An example; I was thinking of writing a Bloodhound Gang article
for the blog – don’t judge – and it would have cost in the region of £8 to get
four used copies of their albums on CD then translate them into MP3s rather
than £32 to buy them on mp3.
Now, buying Used and New means that the
artist isn’t, frankly, seeing a dime.
Let’s say you buy an album from Amazon for
a penny plus £1.25 postage. The seller gets approximately 70p of that –
although fees and percentages change – and the postage costs for that will be
between forty and seventy pence, depending on packaging and package size. So
the seller sees between 30p and nothing per CD and Amazon takes 55p off the
top, and – while I don’t know and wouldn’t like to guess and am not maligning
their business practice – I doubt the artist sees any of that 55p.
(Bear in mind that all figures are
approximate, and my maths is appalling.)
Then there’s Charity Shops.
This is a more lateral example, but I
finally got round to reading some Iain M Banks recently. Now, I’m broke at the
best of times, so I thought charity shops might be the way to go. Except that,
of course, buying books from them means that only the charity sees any money;
the book’s already, in theory, been paid for once, but second-hand sales from
this area only benefit the charity.
Given the circumstances surrounding Mr Bank's recent terrible, terrible news,
I’d really, really like to actually be giving money to him as an author.
Except
there, you run up against the same problem; the digital editions come in at
£4.99 and the print editions at £6.99 new, which is – to my mind – the only way
I can see of making sure that at least some of my purchase money goes towards
the author. A used and new copy can be had for most books for £2.81, and the
copy I bought in Oxfam – which sparked off the idea for this article – was
£2.49.
I would love to live in a world where I
could comfortably afford to pay just under 300% of the market rate (where
market rate is the cheapest rate) for a product just to support someone, but I
spend my time alternating between stony broke and marginally less stony broke,
so if there’s a cheap option, I’d rather pay less and swallow the guilt.
Except the guilt’s not settling.
The days of lavish record company advances
and gross and net points are, most likely, long long gone, and it’s harder and
harder for bands to make their way out of the MySpace Morass or the Social
Networking swamp as a whole in order to even get noticed; actually getting an
album out there seems to be simultaneously easier – through access to
technology and means of production – and harder – in terms of access to
consumers and a large customer base. Meanwhile, consumers who can’t afford the
more expensive option will plump for whatever’s available if they’re anything
like me, and nobody benefits from that, except –
Well, in this case, except for charities.
So that argument isn’t wonderful, because if a charity benefits, then in theory
many people benefit. But I’m reminded of the example of Sandi Thom, and the
swirl that settled around her Basement Broadcasts back in the day, which seemed
like clever usage of limited means but, as was thought back in the day, might
in fact just have been a relatively clever media campaign (and here, as in many
other places, Charlie Brooker puts it better than me.)
This is possibly the most Marxist article
I’ve ever written – I mean, using the phrase Means of Production was probably
the tip-off for most of you – but I simply don’t understand the new media
landscape in terms of art = reward.
Business and art – in this case music – go hand in hand in so many ways,
because you can’t eat your chords and drink your bassline. But the argument
that’s central to eBooks – how you can charge the same for content without
providing a physical product that causes costs for materials and production,
which digital products don’t have – applies to music, too. The only CDs I’ve
bought recently have been from charity shops and the only music I have access
to without a serious hike is via iTunes or Amazon.
In some ways, I guess I’m just bitter that
there isn’t a decent record store anywhere near me. I like the idea of tracking
down rarities or limited edition new releases or owning physical manifestations
of media (even if I digitize them later). It’s engagement with culture on a
level more than just the sterile click click click of online buying; you
actually have to talk to people. But
given the choice between travel costs and spending the money on music, I know
where I throw my wallet down.
No comments:
Post a Comment